Once I'd finished writing up my thoughts about the Hunger Games books, I went ahead and watched the movie. I have to say I wasn't overly impressed.
The major flaw of the movie is the same one I see in a lot of movies based on books: The movie never felt like a coherent story of its own, it was just the book on super duper fast-forward. Most of the important bits from the book are there, in some form, but they've been trimmed for time almost to the point of losing their meaning, and they go by so quickly that I have no idea how anyone who hasn't read the book will have any clue what's going on. All the scenes are there but nothing gets the time or attention it deserves. The entire alliance with Rue lasts ten minutes onscreen. The time Katniss and Peeta spend in the cave is just over nine minutes. The fire attack is less than one. Scene after scene it's the same thing: get the gist of it onscreen and then move on to the next one.
The loss of Katniss's internal monologue really hurts the story as well. So much of what's going on is only going on in her head, how she's feeling, what she's planning, especially in the arena where there can be no external dialogue because she's trying to hide silently. There's no real way around that when you're turning a first person narrative into a movie, but it still hurt the story. The filmmakers efforts to mimic the first-person perspective consisted mainly of trying to confuse the audience in a few places when Katniss was confused: Blurring the shot when she's knocked out by the explosion, or using extreme-closeup shakycam to turn a fight or a run through the woods into an incomprehensible mess.
One advantage to ditching the first-person is that the movie can have scenes that aren't from Katniss's perspective, and does so to great effect. There are several scenes between Gamemaker Seneca Crane and President Snow, and scenes in the Gamemakers' control room, that help move the story along. And a scene from District 11 after Rue dies that helps setup the situation we'll find there during the victory tour in Catching Fire. Several times the movie cuts away to Caesar Flickerman hosting the coverage of the Games so he can supply the audience with information that came from Katniss's internal thoughts in the book.
The filmmakers captured the look and feel of the world very well, I thought. District 12 looked wonderfully drab, except of course for the three incredibly beautiful movie stars who live there. The Capitol was a bit of a mixed bag, the first shots of it, the long view from the train and the shots of people in the streets, weren't as impressive as I was looking for, but the interior shots in various buildings looked very good. The arena looked good as well.
The acting was another mixed bag. I thought Jennifer Lawrence was good as Katniss, she communicated Katniss's mental state in a way that helped make up for the lost internal monologue. Josh Hutcherson is very bland as Peeta. Liam Hemsworth doesn't really do much more than pout a lot as Gale. The supporting cast is better: Woody Harrelson is very good as Haymitch, though the movie doesn't really touch on the more serious sides of his character. Lenny Kravitz is good as Cinna, for the minute or so he's on screen. Donald Sutherland is sufficiently creepy and slimy as President Snow.
Overall, while there were things I liked about the movie, it skipped so quickly through almost everything it did that it was ultimately unsatisfying. Though I see it made $155 million dollars this weekend, so what the fuck do I know?
Final grade: B-
Showing posts with label The Hunger Games. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Hunger Games. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Some thoughts on The Hunger Games
I've had The Hunger Games series on my mental to-read list for a while now, but I never actually got around to them until the movie came out. I could feel myself getting sucked into the movie hype, and if I'm going to read a book I generally like to do so before I see the movie, so the other night I sat down and read The Hunger Games.
I don't mean that I started the series the other night, I read it the other night. These are not thick, meaty books that take time to devour. I read one reviewer compare them to cotton candy, and that analogy seems very apt to me - enjoyable (overall), hard to put down (in places), but ultimately not very fulfilling. The books are written from the first-person perspective of a 16-year-old, targeted for an audience a few years younger than that. Writer Suzanne Collins either accomplished this with expert precision or just isn't a very good writer, because the writing style of these books reminded me very strongly of stories written by classmates in junior high school.
Let me get straight to my biggest problem with the series: I'm big on endings. A large part of my enjoyment of a story hinges on how good the ending is. A bad ending means that an otherwise enjoyable story was a huge waste of time. A great ending can save an otherwise mediocre story, in fact if the story is structured so that it builds to a great ending, then accomplishing that ending means that the story building to it isn't mediocre at all. An unfortunately, the ending is where The Hunger Games series completely fails. The first book is very good, a gripping plot and engaging characters, and by about the middle of the book I no longer found the writing style distracting. The second book, Catching Fire, I also enjoyed, though the weaknesses that would come to full bloom in the third book, Mockingjay, are present to a smaller degree in Catching Fire. This is when large parts of the story become focused on Katniss vacillating over things rather than making decisions and taking action. This is when Katniss laying in bed recovering from things becomes a recurring story trope. This is when the first-person narrative structure, which helps the reader identity so strongly with Katniss in the first book, starts to become a bit of an impediment. First-person storytelling isn't very satisfying when the narrator starts to become less and less involved in the story, as major plot developments start happening off-screen and Katniss/the reader only hears about them as third-hand rumors long after the fact. The second book also suffers a bit from repetition, as the major driver of action in the second half of the book is a re-hash of the first book. But all of these issues were extremely minor in Catching Fire - had Mockingjay been as good as the first book, I would have been a big fan of this series.
Unfortunately, Mockingjay was a huge letdown for me. Part of this is the issues that began in Catching Fire - Huge swaths of Mockingjay are taken up by Katniss recuperating from various injuries and breakdowns, which is a realistic depiction of how a sixteen-year-old thrust into the middle of a war might react but is not very entertaining to read. As she is further sidelined and marginalized from the front lines of the main conflict, so is the reader. Once she finally goes back into action, that action is meaningless - first on purpose as it's simply another propaganda shoot, but even when she goes on her "secret mission" she accomplishes nothing but getting her squad killed and has no effect on the war.
In the end Mockingjay takes the story that started in The Hunger Games - about someone used and manipulated by a tyrannical government who manages to overcome and survive through her own skill and determination - and turns it into something very bleak, about someone used and manipulated by everyone, even the good guys, even her closest allies, whose spirit is broken and gives up trying to fight it. There's a perfectly valid, if bleak, story that Collins is telling in Mockingjay: that one power-hungry child-killing dictator will simply be replaced by another; that one regime of propagandist liars will simply be replaced by another; that the public at large will never, ever know the truth about anything and even a revolution will never change that; that ultimately nobody can really change the nature of things; that even the strongest of people eventually give up trying to fight these things, give up even trying to tell people the truth about them. But to begin a series with The Hunger Games, to fan the flames of populist revolt in Catching Fire, and then to end Mockingjay on that note was a huge letdown to me. Call me simple-minded, but I like more satisfying endings in my escapist fantasy. At least not having our viewpoint character beaten down and defeated in every way. She could have at least kept fighting, at least try to tell people the truth about Cain, instead of simply give up. Even the one thing she set out to do at the start of The Hunger Games is taken from her by the end of Mockingjay.
The reason the ending bothers me so much is because there really is a lot to like about the series - Katniss is a great character. I've seen people say she's not sympathetic, that she's too cold, and I couldn't disagree more. She's been shaped by her experiences, but she clearly has a good heart, otherwise she wouldn't even be in the Games. And why is a character cold and unsympathetic just because she's learned to survive in her world? The action sequences are well told, and Katniss's strategy in the Games is interesting to read. The development of the Katniss-Peeta relationship in the first two books I also really liked, though here again the second book retreads some ground already covered by the first. The plucky underdog leading a rebellion against a tyrannical dictator is a classic story, and the buildup to it in the first two books is good even if the payoff isn't there in the third.
In the end, The Hunger Games is the worst kind of story to me - a great buildup with a bad payoff. This is the worst kind of story for me as a reader, because it means for the next few weeks when my mind is on the story, and really from now on whenever I think about it, I'm going to keep rewriting the ending in my head, trying to bring the story to a more satisfactory conclusion.
I can't say for sure that Suzanne Collins wrote a bad story with The Hunger Games series. But ultimately she didn't write one I wanted to read.
Final grades:
The Hunger Games: A
Catching Fire: A-
Mockingjay: D
Overall series: C-
I don't mean that I started the series the other night, I read it the other night. These are not thick, meaty books that take time to devour. I read one reviewer compare them to cotton candy, and that analogy seems very apt to me - enjoyable (overall), hard to put down (in places), but ultimately not very fulfilling. The books are written from the first-person perspective of a 16-year-old, targeted for an audience a few years younger than that. Writer Suzanne Collins either accomplished this with expert precision or just isn't a very good writer, because the writing style of these books reminded me very strongly of stories written by classmates in junior high school.
Let me get straight to my biggest problem with the series: I'm big on endings. A large part of my enjoyment of a story hinges on how good the ending is. A bad ending means that an otherwise enjoyable story was a huge waste of time. A great ending can save an otherwise mediocre story, in fact if the story is structured so that it builds to a great ending, then accomplishing that ending means that the story building to it isn't mediocre at all. An unfortunately, the ending is where The Hunger Games series completely fails. The first book is very good, a gripping plot and engaging characters, and by about the middle of the book I no longer found the writing style distracting. The second book, Catching Fire, I also enjoyed, though the weaknesses that would come to full bloom in the third book, Mockingjay, are present to a smaller degree in Catching Fire. This is when large parts of the story become focused on Katniss vacillating over things rather than making decisions and taking action. This is when Katniss laying in bed recovering from things becomes a recurring story trope. This is when the first-person narrative structure, which helps the reader identity so strongly with Katniss in the first book, starts to become a bit of an impediment. First-person storytelling isn't very satisfying when the narrator starts to become less and less involved in the story, as major plot developments start happening off-screen and Katniss/the reader only hears about them as third-hand rumors long after the fact. The second book also suffers a bit from repetition, as the major driver of action in the second half of the book is a re-hash of the first book. But all of these issues were extremely minor in Catching Fire - had Mockingjay been as good as the first book, I would have been a big fan of this series.
Unfortunately, Mockingjay was a huge letdown for me. Part of this is the issues that began in Catching Fire - Huge swaths of Mockingjay are taken up by Katniss recuperating from various injuries and breakdowns, which is a realistic depiction of how a sixteen-year-old thrust into the middle of a war might react but is not very entertaining to read. As she is further sidelined and marginalized from the front lines of the main conflict, so is the reader. Once she finally goes back into action, that action is meaningless - first on purpose as it's simply another propaganda shoot, but even when she goes on her "secret mission" she accomplishes nothing but getting her squad killed and has no effect on the war.
In the end Mockingjay takes the story that started in The Hunger Games - about someone used and manipulated by a tyrannical government who manages to overcome and survive through her own skill and determination - and turns it into something very bleak, about someone used and manipulated by everyone, even the good guys, even her closest allies, whose spirit is broken and gives up trying to fight it. There's a perfectly valid, if bleak, story that Collins is telling in Mockingjay: that one power-hungry child-killing dictator will simply be replaced by another; that one regime of propagandist liars will simply be replaced by another; that the public at large will never, ever know the truth about anything and even a revolution will never change that; that ultimately nobody can really change the nature of things; that even the strongest of people eventually give up trying to fight these things, give up even trying to tell people the truth about them. But to begin a series with The Hunger Games, to fan the flames of populist revolt in Catching Fire, and then to end Mockingjay on that note was a huge letdown to me. Call me simple-minded, but I like more satisfying endings in my escapist fantasy. At least not having our viewpoint character beaten down and defeated in every way. She could have at least kept fighting, at least try to tell people the truth about Cain, instead of simply give up. Even the one thing she set out to do at the start of The Hunger Games is taken from her by the end of Mockingjay.
The reason the ending bothers me so much is because there really is a lot to like about the series - Katniss is a great character. I've seen people say she's not sympathetic, that she's too cold, and I couldn't disagree more. She's been shaped by her experiences, but she clearly has a good heart, otherwise she wouldn't even be in the Games. And why is a character cold and unsympathetic just because she's learned to survive in her world? The action sequences are well told, and Katniss's strategy in the Games is interesting to read. The development of the Katniss-Peeta relationship in the first two books I also really liked, though here again the second book retreads some ground already covered by the first. The plucky underdog leading a rebellion against a tyrannical dictator is a classic story, and the buildup to it in the first two books is good even if the payoff isn't there in the third.
In the end, The Hunger Games is the worst kind of story to me - a great buildup with a bad payoff. This is the worst kind of story for me as a reader, because it means for the next few weeks when my mind is on the story, and really from now on whenever I think about it, I'm going to keep rewriting the ending in my head, trying to bring the story to a more satisfactory conclusion.
I can't say for sure that Suzanne Collins wrote a bad story with The Hunger Games series. But ultimately she didn't write one I wanted to read.
Final grades:
The Hunger Games: A
Catching Fire: A-
Mockingjay: D
Overall series: C-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
